China is to reassert its control over Tibet with his usual contempt for the right to assemble peacefully and the freedom of the press. China "liberated" Tibet from its traditional way of life and envoys of the Dalai Lama into exile in 1959. They pointed out that Tibet had the highest priestly class living of farmers never registered (25%). The Chinese have said then that it could escape a child per family rule if they moved to the Tibetan region of China.
Culturism argues that most cultures have the right to define, protect and promote themselves. Culturism not buy in the human rights regime. It would seem culturism given carte blanch approval to the actions of Chinese. The hard question culturists is "do the majority in China has right to do wants it to minorities within its population?"
Tibetans include even the culture of the majority in Tibet. Despite the discrimination of China to their own people and try to take Tibet demographically, environment of Tibet is so severe that even minor ethnic is 10% of the population. Since Tibet has had sovereignty and a different culture and has a chance to regain the State, culturist principles condemn the actions of China. Within the old borders of Tibet, the Tibetans must have sovereignty.
But from here in culturism assumed his usual position hard realism. Not all cultures believe in Western values. China is a nation based on race to not award democracy or freedom of expression. It is right of China. Culturism would never condemn China to follow its historical cultural principles internally. China, like the Islamic Nations, is free to look at our debt, crime, racial issues, rates of childbirth outside of marriage, as well as our school failure and concluded that our roads are not to be desired. Culturism wants to protect our way of life for us, but respects the fact that there is a diversity of international principles.
What can we do about Tibet? Not much. Our armed forces are already spread thin trying to do to the West of the Islamic East. To carry out a war against China over Tibet, we would have to borrow money from them. As it is, if officially complain or boycott the Olympics in China that could retaliate by damaging our economy. Our not knowing where the ends of the Western world, poor economics and moral behavior have weakened Western power. Before that we care about the other sovereignty we must ensure our own. If you want to help Tibet, work hard, buy American, be moral and get out of debt assets.
John press is the author of Culturism: a word value, our future. He is also an adjunct professor and Ph.d. from New York University student. http://www.culturism.us has more information on culturism.